This is a naturalist anti-stupids blog. Stupids = theists. I dislike the term "brights" to describe the rest of us but, hey, we can get a schism going here! Then we can emulate the faith-heads and torture and kill to our heart's content to make sure everyone else lert standing adheres to our precise version of unbelief.
Sunday, November 13, 2011
Reflecting
So I listen to the Northern Irish vicar on Radio 4 reflecting on 50,000 lives given in war. Why not reflect on the existence of your insane despotic god who created what you call the "horror and desolation"? Reflect that warriors did not give their lives but had them taken from them by the predecessors of those gathered now in commemoration.
Sunday, March 06, 2011
The Foundation of Morality
...is not founded in christianity. They believe that the rest of us go to a burning pit for all eternity. Muslims believe that christians go to that self same pit. Choose something else. American christians are the worst, however. They will not tolerate even the expression of a belief that the rest of us do not go to hell. They have shown their colours in the debate over Rob Bell. Just google his name and see how christian these christians are!
Sunday, January 16, 2011
BBC Censorship
The good old BBC (bastion of free speech) blocked the following comment:
There are lots of good bits in the King James version. The best thing about it, however, is that reading it shows how hilariously stupid it is to be a theist (mono or multi). Read all about Abraham and his chats with god you dimwits. Omniscient? All knowimg? Did not know how many righteous people there were in Sod Them? Bartered it down to ten and then saved the one who offered up his daughters to be raped as fair recompense for not bumming the guests? Oh ye stupid jews, christians and muslims:
Thus were both the daughters of Lot with child by their father. (KJ 19.36)
You have all signed up to the pentacheuch and therefore all of you miserable little sinners ought to be on the Sex Offenders Register. See, I can use capitals when I want to. I can't be bothered with apostrophes, tho'.
When I put it in quotation marks it slipped through. See the link.
I have not bothered with this blog in a while because no-one reads it but the BBC charlatans just got my goat.
There are lots of good bits in the King James version. The best thing about it, however, is that reading it shows how hilariously stupid it is to be a theist (mono or multi). Read all about Abraham and his chats with god you dimwits. Omniscient? All knowimg? Did not know how many righteous people there were in Sod Them? Bartered it down to ten and then saved the one who offered up his daughters to be raped as fair recompense for not bumming the guests? Oh ye stupid jews, christians and muslims:
Thus were both the daughters of Lot with child by their father. (KJ 19.36)
You have all signed up to the pentacheuch and therefore all of you miserable little sinners ought to be on the Sex Offenders Register. See, I can use capitals when I want to. I can't be bothered with apostrophes, tho'.
When I put it in quotation marks it slipped through. See the link.
I have not bothered with this blog in a while because no-one reads it but the BBC charlatans just got my goat.
Friday, April 16, 2010
This blog has moved
This blog is now located at http://divorcingreality.blogspot.com/.
You will be automatically redirected in 30 seconds or you may click here.
For feed subscribers, please update your feed subscriptions to
http://divorcingreality.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default.
Saturday, February 20, 2010
Vanishing
This site will vanish soon. It no longer interests me and it has never interested anyone else. I am just checking whether I could make it available for open posting.
Thursday, December 31, 2009
Burning Tiger Woods: A New Year Story in Pictures
Tiger, tiger, burning bright
We are ending our sponsorship agreement with you and wish you well in the future...
In the forests of the night.
What immortal hand or eye
Dared frame your fearful symmetry?
In what distant deeps or skies
Burnt the fire of your eyes?
On what wings did you aspire?
What hand did dare seize your fire?
And what shoulder and what art
Twisted your sinews and your heart?
And when your heart begain to beat,
What dread hand and what dread feet?
What the hammer? what the chain?
In what furnace was your brain?
What the anvil? What dread grasp?
Dared your deadly terrors clasp?
When the stars threw down their spears,
And watered heaven with their tears,
Did He smile His work to see?
Did He who made the lamb make thee?
Tiger, tiger, burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Dared frame thy fearful symmetry?
Happy New Year
So, this is news? Bobbies Like a Bacon Sarnie? In a Nice Comfie Station? Instead of Going out in Nasty Cold Weather catching CRIMINALS.
A nice cup of tea and a bun as well, please.
“Some police officers - whatever they may say - actually enjoy staying in the police station in the warm. We are dealing with human beings, but we are also dealing with the kind of discipline and culture in the police service.”The police are of course "furious", just like MPs were when their expenses were exposed to scrutiny.
Mr Straw added: “It is very striking around this country that if you go to one police force it is up for it, getting crime down and really motoring, while the adjacent force - serving very similar communities - has not got it together.
“It is not about money, it is about leadership, organisation and culture.”
Thursday, October 22, 2009
Hetty the Hotty Goes Mad Or Is It Someone Else Who Is Equally. Or Even More, Insane?
Hi Steven
My name is James Dean, and I'm your new best friend. I came across your blog while looking for something else, but you're perfect! Your combination of smug and needy is perfection! I'm going to follow every move you make. You will never be alone again!
BTW, what is it with you and Hetty Baynes? Did she turn you down some time? Little case of hurt pride?
Oh, and the novel-writing ambition - fab! - you couldn't make it up! xx
20 October 2009 00:31
Hi there, my new best friend. You are no doubt going to become the star of this blog - well, as previously posted, I have lost interest and no-one else appears to be interested.
You may be a thicko, and that will entertain the readers that I do not have, but did it not occur to you that your IP address is now in my log files?
Maybe, I will broadcast it. Oh, sod the maybe. I will make time just for you.
Saturday, September 26, 2009
Hetty Baynes Again: Losing a Grip on Reality
It seems that it is not only Chris Keil who wants to post inane comments to the Hetty Baynes blog:
1. No-one else has difficulty emailing me. Oh, alright, try going to The Firm.
2. You are either a very bad lawyer or a very badly advised lay person and clearly have no understanding of the law of defamation.
3. If you think this is a blog about one case then that can only be because you accessed one page. Either (a) you are fixated on Hetty Baynes and/or (b) you are Hetty Baynes and/or (c) you are off your rocker and/or (d) you are a perfectly nice sane human being who just had one too many on 17th September this year.
3. Sue me. Go on, I dare you. Your brain is addled.
4. Ooo! You can only sue me if YOU ARE HETTY BAYNES! Well, at least that would explain 2 above.
As there is no e-mail address to send you a discreet communication - I'm having to post it here on your site:For reasons set out in the previous post I have not been checking up on this blog much recently. This is posted by another "Anonymous" (I will find you dear). I suppose that is because he or she wants to remain "discreet" or, possibly, not expose themself to ridicule. Too late!
What you have written is very distressing and unprofessional and an outright defamation of character towards someone who has done nothing to deserve your venom.
I'm kindly asking you to remove them and request that you refrain from passing judgment on people or cases you know nothing about.
If this is truly a blog about legal matters - where are all the OTHER legal matters you are supposed to be 'commenting' on???? Funny isn't it that it is just this case you mention... Seems to me that you are acting on someone's behalf - sour grapes to say the least!
You do not need to be reminded what the consequences of libel are... Do you?
1. No-one else has difficulty emailing me. Oh, alright, try going to The Firm.
2. You are either a very bad lawyer or a very badly advised lay person and clearly have no understanding of the law of defamation.
3. If you think this is a blog about one case then that can only be because you accessed one page. Either (a) you are fixated on Hetty Baynes and/or (b) you are Hetty Baynes and/or (c) you are off your rocker and/or (d) you are a perfectly nice sane human being who just had one too many on 17th September this year.
3. Sue me. Go on, I dare you. Your brain is addled.
4. Ooo! You can only sue me if YOU ARE HETTY BAYNES! Well, at least that would explain 2 above.
The Meaning of Life
Trust me to get it wrong. There I am (provoked by Chris Keil) banging on about the meaninglessness of it all and reading Climbing Mount Improbable (very good, get a copy) and the ten ton truck shows up. So now I am head over heels in love and every single moment in her arms is just stuffed full of meaning. Oh, well.
Sunday, August 23, 2009
Blade Running
I just woke up to hear that a lady's body has been identified by the serial numbers of her breast implants.
Well, there's another chore to add to a would be murderer's checklist of things to remove: fingers, teeth, breast implants...
Well, there's another chore to add to a would be murderer's checklist of things to remove: fingers, teeth, breast implants...
Saturday, August 22, 2009
The Meaninglessness of Meaninglessness
Visit the Daily Mail website. It is an everyday example of why nothing matters. The news, for them, is how much bigger, or less big, Jordan's tits were yesterday than the day before. The news, for them, is how many more, or fewer, drinks Jade Goody's ex-husband had the night before.
The Daily Mail is an easy target. The Daily Mail takes itself seriously but is in fact a shameful disgrace - as are all those who work for it, including its pompous self-regarding columnists: the opinion formers of middle England.
Is The Times any better? No, not really.
It is all a charade. Even the news about death and destruction, the machinations of infantile politicians and reviews of Chris Keil's books are wholly without merit or content of any kind that might for even the briefest second be meaningful.
Really, it is all Chris Keil's fault that I hardly bother with this blog any more. He has done you a service.
Oh, well, nothing new here then.
Cheer up! If it is all meaningless then you might as well have some fun.
The Daily Mail is an easy target. The Daily Mail takes itself seriously but is in fact a shameful disgrace - as are all those who work for it, including its pompous self-regarding columnists: the opinion formers of middle England.
Is The Times any better? No, not really.
It is all a charade. Even the news about death and destruction, the machinations of infantile politicians and reviews of Chris Keil's books are wholly without merit or content of any kind that might for even the briefest second be meaningful.
Really, it is all Chris Keil's fault that I hardly bother with this blog any more. He has done you a service.
Oh, well, nothing new here then.
Cheer up! If it is all meaningless then you might as well have some fun.
Wednesday, July 01, 2009
Andy Murray v Frank Skinner
I have just watched the Murray v Ferrero match, which I could enjoy a bit.
However, I have also just been reading Frank Skinner's autobiography and distracting excerpts kept creeping into my mind as Andy Murray banged it down the court.
The problem is that Andy Murray and Frank Skinner look alike or, at the very least, share a similar sort of ugliness.
Of course, one of them can do push-ups without his legs touching the floor and the other just used to be legless most of the time. I'm not saying there are no differences that might enable you to tell them apart. For instance, one of them can tell jokes and the other gives the impression that jokes are a strange extraterrestrial concept that he long ago dismissed as one of those childish things that an adult puts behind him. One laughs a lot (including, endearingly, at his own jokes) and the other...ok, you find a picture on the Internet that shows Andy Murray smiling, let alone laughing.
Frank Skinner glories in the fact that his success has enabled him to have anal sex and any other kind of sex he wants with much younger and much prettier girls than he is himself (and he is entirely candid about being neither a young nor a pretty man). He also boasts about having swallowed a lot of tiny bits of toilet paper when he has, demonstrating his commitment to equality, gone down on these girls. OK, that is probably comic exaggeration (but it also probably happened once - because Frank keeps telling us about his telling and he says, always, that his telling is the truth). I believe the truth of the first sentence though.
The reason for that is not only that Andy Murray's current girlfriend is beautiful but that, in addition, they showed shots of a former girlfriend who happened also to be a former Miss Scotland who, would you believe it, was accompanied by another former Miss Scotland; both of them seemingly very enthusiastic about Andy - or, maybe, they are just tennis aficiandos.
Frank says its just being famous. He says that the more famous you are the more women you get to shag. He excuses his penchant for shagging young women because they would not look at him when he was young and unknown. Now, he can have almost any woman he wants.
Either Andy Murray gets to screw beautiful women because he is incredibly witty and empathetic (in addition to being famous) or he just gets these women because he is more famous than Frank Skinner. Maybe he and Frank should have a talk and do some trades.
I speak, of course, as an ugly person who is not famous, but it all seems a bit shallow.
I also speak as an atheist and cannot therefore say anything against someone leading a shallow life in the knowledge that it does not matter a damn and, hey, we will all be a long time in the grave: oblivious to our past misdeeds and pleasures. Therefore, fuck anything that moves. Indeed, why require movement?
But, Frank Skinner professes to be a genuine hands on Roman Catholic who gets his chauffeur to stop and let him light candles at suitable churches.
Having it both ways, Frank? Well, I guess you have already told us that.
However, I have also just been reading Frank Skinner's autobiography and distracting excerpts kept creeping into my mind as Andy Murray banged it down the court.
Frank Skinner glories in the fact that his success has enabled him to have anal sex and any other kind of sex he wants with much younger and much prettier girls than he is himself (and he is entirely candid about being neither a young nor a pretty man). He also boasts about having swallowed a lot of tiny bits of toilet paper when he has, demonstrating his commitment to equality, gone down on these girls. OK, that is probably comic exaggeration (but it also probably happened once - because Frank keeps telling us about his telling and he says, always, that his telling is the truth). I believe the truth of the first sentence though.
The reason for that is not only that Andy Murray's current girlfriend is beautiful but that, in addition, they showed shots of a former girlfriend who happened also to be a former Miss Scotland who, would you believe it, was accompanied by another former Miss Scotland; both of them seemingly very enthusiastic about Andy - or, maybe, they are just tennis aficiandos.
Frank says its just being famous. He says that the more famous you are the more women you get to shag. He excuses his penchant for shagging young women because they would not look at him when he was young and unknown. Now, he can have almost any woman he wants.
Either Andy Murray gets to screw beautiful women because he is incredibly witty and empathetic (in addition to being famous) or he just gets these women because he is more famous than Frank Skinner. Maybe he and Frank should have a talk and do some trades.
I speak, of course, as an ugly person who is not famous, but it all seems a bit shallow.
I also speak as an atheist and cannot therefore say anything against someone leading a shallow life in the knowledge that it does not matter a damn and, hey, we will all be a long time in the grave: oblivious to our past misdeeds and pleasures. Therefore, fuck anything that moves. Indeed, why require movement?
But, Frank Skinner professes to be a genuine hands on Roman Catholic who gets his chauffeur to stop and let him light candles at suitable churches.
Having it both ways, Frank? Well, I guess you have already told us that.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)