As there is no e-mail address to send you a discreet communication - I'm having to post it here on your site:For reasons set out in the previous post I have not been checking up on this blog much recently. This is posted by another "Anonymous" (I will find you dear). I suppose that is because he or she wants to remain "discreet" or, possibly, not expose themself to ridicule. Too late!
What you have written is very distressing and unprofessional and an outright defamation of character towards someone who has done nothing to deserve your venom.
I'm kindly asking you to remove them and request that you refrain from passing judgment on people or cases you know nothing about.
If this is truly a blog about legal matters - where are all the OTHER legal matters you are supposed to be 'commenting' on???? Funny isn't it that it is just this case you mention... Seems to me that you are acting on someone's behalf - sour grapes to say the least!
You do not need to be reminded what the consequences of libel are... Do you?
1. No-one else has difficulty emailing me. Oh, alright, try going to The Firm.
2. You are either a very bad lawyer or a very badly advised lay person and clearly have no understanding of the law of defamation.
3. If you think this is a blog about one case then that can only be because you accessed one page. Either (a) you are fixated on Hetty Baynes and/or (b) you are Hetty Baynes and/or (c) you are off your rocker and/or (d) you are a perfectly nice sane human being who just had one too many on 17th September this year.
3. Sue me. Go on, I dare you. Your brain is addled.
4. Ooo! You can only sue me if YOU ARE HETTY BAYNES! Well, at least that would explain 2 above.
